Main Conflicts of Interest
In 1992, when Central Asia entered the post-Soviet period, a number of conflicts of interest surfaced, reflecting the intricate dynamics of the area's newly sovereign republics. Combinations of historical, ethnic, economic, and geopolitical forces influenced these battles. The following are some of the major conflicts of interest that existed in Central Asia at the time:
Territorial Disputes
These territorial disputes, rooted in the Soviet era and the hasty demarcation of borders, often escalated into border clashes and disputes in the early 1990s. They were exacerbated by issues related to land ownership, control of valuable resources, and the rights of local communities. Resolving these disputes was a challenging process that required diplomatic negotiations, boundary delimitation, and international mediation in some cases. Over time, some of these disputes were resolved or managed, while others remain unresolved and continue to influence regional dynamics and foreign policy decisions in Central Asia.
Kazakhstan:
The Chu Valley Dispute: The Chu Valley, which is abundant in natural resources including water and minerals, was the subject of a long-running territorial dispute between Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. The dispute centered on the ownership of land and resources in this area as well as the definition of the boundary. It served as a point of contention between the two nations.
Lake Balkhash: A part of Lake Balkhash, a sizable freshwater lake that crosses their boundaries, was also a point of contention between Kazakhstan and China. Fishing and resource rights in the region were impacted by disagreements about the precise definition of the boundary via the lake.
Kyrgyzstan:
Ferghana Valley: With Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan shared the Ferghana Valley, an area well-known for its agricultural importance. In this heavily populated region, disagreements over the use of property, access to water, and the defining of boundaries were frequent.
Water Disputes with Uzbekistan: Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan were involved in especially major water conflicts. It was a constant cause of conflict how the Amu Darya and Syr Darya rivers, which passed through these nations, were used. Concerns were raised in Uzbekistan, which primarily relied on these rivers for agriculture, by Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan's choices to construct hydroelectric dams that altered the flow of water downstream.
Tajikistan:
The Rasht Valley: The Rasht Valley, located in the eastern section of the nation, was the source of a dispute between Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan. Territorial boundaries and land usage were critical challenges in the area because of its steep topography and scarcity of fertile land.
The Pamir Mountains: Tajikistan's borders with China in the Pamir Mountains were a subject of negotiation and discussion, with precise border lines impacting resource access, particularly regarding mining and mineral resources in the region.
Ethnic Tensions
In summary, ethnic tensions in Central Asian states in 1992 were complex, and often rooted in historical, cultural, and socio-economic differences. The transition to independence and the redefinition of national identities posed challenges and sometimes exacerbated these tensions. Issues related to land distribution, access to resources, and cultural identity were central to these ethnic conflicts. The management and resolution of these tensions required careful policies, social integration efforts, and sometimes international mediation. Ethnic diversity remained a defining feature of the region, influencing both domestic and foreign policy decisions in these newly independent states.
Kazakhstan:
Kazakh vs. Russian Tensions: Kazakhstan, with its significant Russian-speaking population, experienced ethnic tensions between ethnic Kazakhs and Russians. After gaining independence, the government sought to promote Kazakh identity and culture, which sometimes led to concerns and grievances among the Russian-speaking minority.
Land Distribution: Land distribution was a key issue exacerbating ethnic tensions. The transition from collective ownership of land under the Soviet system to private ownership in independent Kazakhstan raised concerns about the allocation of land and resources, leading to tensions between ethnic groups.
Uzbekistan:
Tensions between Uzbeks and Tajiks: Ethnic Tajiks make up a sizable portion of Uzbekistan's population. Conflicts between Tajiks and Uzbeks were mostly brought on by differences in culture, language, and history. In the Ferghana Valley, which Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Afghanistan all share, such battles were particularly common.
Religious Identity: Religious identity was another source of tension. Uzbekistan's government, concerned about Islamic fundamentalism, sought to control religious practices. This created tensions with conservative religious communities, who saw these policies as oppressive.
Kyrgyzstan:
Kyrgyz and Uzbek Tensions: Due to the significant Uzbek population, there were ethnic tensions between Kyrgyz and Uzbek all across the nation. Disparities in language, culture, and access to resources, as well as to land, were the causes of these disputes. The city of Osh was particularly affected by these hostilities.
Territorial Disputes: Ethnic tensions were also intertwined with territorial disputes, especially in the Ferghana Valley, which was home to a mixed population of Kyrgyz, Uzbeks, and Tajiks. The exact borders in this region were a point of contention.
Tajikistan:
Tajik vs. Uzbek Tensions: Tajikistan had a significant Uzbek minority, particularly in the northern part of the country. These tensions were often related to the allocation of resources, land, and access to government positions.
Civil War and Ethnic Division: The early 1990s saw a devastating civil war in Tajikistan, with ethnic divisions playing a role. The conflict pitted the Tajik-dominated government against a largely Uzbek opposition, leading to violent clashes and deepening ethnic divisions.
Water Resource Disputes
Water resource management and allocation in Central Asia were controversial topics in the area. The Amu Darya and Syr Darya are two major rivers in Central Asia, originating in the mountains of Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan and flowing through multiple countries in the region.
They are essential sources of water for irrigation, agriculture, and hydropower production. Most of the conflicts regarding the water resources mainly center on these two rivers. Agriculture in downstream nations like Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, and Turkmenistan depended on these rivers, and the situation became more complicated when upstream nations attempted to build dams and other infrastructure that could potentially disrupt the supply of water. Various international organizations, including the United Nations, were involved in facilitating dialogues and negotiations regarding the agreements regarding the water resources in the area.
Uzbekistan:
Historical Water Rights: Uzbekistan, as a downstream country, has historically relied on water from these rivers for its extensive cotton and agricultural production. The country asserted historical water rights based on the Soviet-era distribution of water resources, which favored downstream countries like Uzbekistan.
Irrigation Dependency: Uzbekistan's economy heavily depends on irrigation agriculture, particularly for cotton production. The Amu Darya and Syr Darya rivers are vital for maintaining the extensive irrigation networks that support the country's agricultural sector.
Kazakhstan:
Impact of Upstream Dams: Kazakhstan, another downstream country, raised concerns about the construction of dams and reservoirs in upstream countries, particularly Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. These infrastructure projects could impact the flow of water downstream and disrupt irrigation in Kazakhstan's southern regions.
Transboundary Resource Management: Kazakhstan, while needing water for its agriculture, recognized the need for transboundary cooperation and the equitable management of water resources. This recognition was based on the principles of international water law and cooperation with neighboring countries.
Turkmenistan:
Agricultural Dependency: Turkmenistan, located to the south of Uzbekistan, also relied on water from the Amu Darya for its agriculture sector. The country was concerned about any potential reductions in the flow of the river, which could impact its cotton production.
Efforts for Cooperation: Turkmenistan, like other downstream countries, sought cooperation and negotiated agreements with its neighbors for the sustainable management of water resources. The country recognized the importance of regional collaboration in addressing water-related challenges.
Common Challenges:
Infrastructure Development: The construction of dams, reservoirs, and hydroelectric power plants in upstream countries was a key point of contention. While these projects could provide electricity and enhance water storage, they also raised concerns about water availability downstream.
Inadequate Infrastructure: Some countries in the region had inadequate infrastructure for efficient water use. Addressing this challenge was crucial to reducing water wastage and enhancing the equitable distribution of resources.
Environmental Impact: The excessive use of water for irrigation had negative environmental consequences, including the depletion of the Aral Sea. Addressing these ecological concerns while ensuring a sustainable water supply was a significant challenge.
Resource Wealth
Central Asia was and is still known for its significant oil and natural gas reserves, particularly in countries like Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan. The region is also rich in various minerals, including gold, silver, uranium, and rare earth elements. The region's vast energy and mineral resources were a source of both potential wealth and contention. Central Asian nations sought to maximize their economic benefits from these resources, leading to disputes over exploration, extraction, and export routes. These common disputes affected the political and economic growth of the region and entailed discussions, environmental concerns, income distribution, and the participation of foreign firms in resource exploitation. These resources had the potential to generate substantial wealth for the region, but they also gave rise to various issues.
Resource Management and Transparency: The management of resource wealth, revenue distribution, and the transparency of the extractive industries were common challenges in the region. Disputes and contentions often arose from issues such as:
Corruption: Concerns about corruption in the management of resource revenue and contracts with foreign companies were widespread. Lack of transparency and accountability led to disputes.
Revenue Distribution: Decisions about how resource revenue would be distributed among regions and the central government created tensions within some countries, particularly those with significant resource wealth.
Environmental Impact: The extraction of minerals and energy resources often had detrimental environmental impacts. These environmental concerns led to conflicts between resource companies, the government, and local communities.
Foreign Investment: The role of foreign companies in resource extraction was a source of contention. Host countries sought to maximize their benefits from foreign investments while foreign companies aimed to secure favorable terms.
Kazakhstan:
Oil Reserves in the Caspian Sea: Kazakhstan's portion of the Caspian Sea is believed to hold extensive oil reserves. This led to disputes over the demarcation of maritime boundaries and the legal status of the Caspian Sea, which remains unresolved to this day. The transportation of oil and natural gas from Central Asia to global markets required the establishment of pipeline routes. Decisions about these routes, whether they went through Russia, China, or other countries, led to negotiations, political maneuvering, and disputes among the countries involved.
Turkmenistan:
Natural Gas Reserves: Turkmenistan possesses vast natural gas reserves, which are crucial for its economy. The country has sought to maximize its export potential, particularly by diversifying its gas export routes and pursuing multiple gas export routes, including pipelines to Russia, Iran, and China. These choices led to discussions about gas pricing, transit fees, and the balance between exporting to different markets.
Uzbekistan:
Gold Mining: Uzbekistan is a significant gold producer in the region. The government's control over gold mines and the regulation of the industry led to disputes with international mining companies and concerns about transparency.
Kyrgyzstan:
Mining Sector: Kyrgyzstan has valuable mineral resources, particularly in the extraction of gold and other metals. The management of mining licenses, environmental concerns, and the role of foreign mining companies were contentious issues.
Religious Influence
The rise of Islamic fundamentalism and the influence of extremist groups in some Central Asian states raised concerns. These groups sought to promote radical ideologies and posed a security threat, leading to tensions with governments trying to maintain stability. The activities of extremist groups were often rooted in political, ethnic, and socio-economic factors and were exacerbated by regional instability and the aftermath of the Soviet Union's dissolution which was still a prominent factor in 1992.
Tajikistan:
Civil War and Islamic Militancy: Between 1992 and 1997, Tajikistan saw a terrible civil war, with Islamic terrorist organizations becoming a major factor in the fighting. Among these groups was the Islamist-leaning United Tajik Opposition (UTO). Islamist opposition organizations and secular government troops engaged in a civil war as both sides fought for control of the nation. With the UTO receiving backing from ethnic Uzbeks and other minorities, and the government being predominantly Tajik, the power struggle also had an ethnic undertone.
Uzbekistan:
Authoritarian Governance and Religious Repression: President Islam Karimov of Uzbekistan took a staunchly authoritarian stand against non-state-sanctioned religious expression. As a part of this strategy, religious groups like Hizb ut-Tahrir and the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU) that were seen as radical were suppressed.
The IMU was an Islamist extremist organization that aimed to create an Islamic state in Central Asia, especially in Uzbekistan. The organization engaged in aggressive behavior, including local attacks. Concerns over regional security and the propagation of extremism were raised by the IMU's operations.
Kyrgyzstan:
Tensions and Radicalization: There have been increasing conflicts in Kyrgyzstan between various religious groups. Radicalization was facilitated in certain places by the existence of extremist organizations and Islamic fundamentalist movements. These organizations worked to spread their beliefs, frequently against the secular goals of the government. Threats to national security and the influence of extremist organizations were worries for Kyrgyz authorities. This prompted attempts to keep an eye on and regulate religious practices across the nation, which occasionally caused friction with religious groups and has been seen as oppression.
Kazakhstan:
Religious Variety: Orthodox Christians, numerous religious groups, and a sizable Muslim community coexist in Kazakhstan, a country renowned for its religious variety. Though worries about the spread of Islamic radicalism remained, the administration worked to foster interfaith unity and tolerance. In response to the perceived threat posed by extremism, the government implemented counterterrorism measures. While maintaining national security and preventing radicalization were the goals of these actions, civil rights and religious freedom were also questioned.
Geopolitical Competition:
Due to its advantageous position and plentiful resources, Central Asia was sought by both regional and international powers as a battleground. Competitors fought for control over the region's resources, the most notable ones being the United States, China, Russia, and Iran. The competition among these powers and the interventions in the region added complexity to Central Asia's already turbulent political landscape.
United States:
Economic Interests: As a significant participant on the world stage, the United States understood the potential economic benefits of Central Asia's energy resources. In order to access Kazakhstan's substantial oil deposits, American energy corporations were eager to invest in the area.
Geostrategic Importance: The position of Central Asia was considered strategically important, especially in light of the Afghanistan War. To assist its activities in Afghanistan, the United States attempted to build military outposts and cooperation agreements with nations in the area.
Promotion of Democracy: By assisting nations that implemented democratic changes, the United States supported human rights and democratic principles throughout the area.
Tensions with the authoritarian regimes in the area occasionally resulted from this strategy.
Russia:
Historical ties: Russia has always had a significant historical impact in the area, particularly as the former Soviet Union's successor state. Russia and the Central Asian nations maintained their cultural, military, and economic relations.
Security Interests: Through the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), Russia remained militarily present in a number of Central Asian nations. According to the report, this presence was solely there to protect the area from any threats and to ensure regional security.
Economic Partnerships: In the energy and natural resource domains in particular, Russia was a major trading partner for several Central Asian nations. By keeping control over pipelines and energy infrastructure, it was able to maintain economic power and influence over the many Central Asian States.
China:
Economic Engagement: China aimed to enhance its economic connections with Central Asia, particularly in the energy industry, through increased engagement. To get access to the energy resources in the area, it made investments in trade agreements, pipeline construction, and infrastructure projects. China's ambitious Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) placed special emphasis on Central Asia as a vital energy and commercial transit corridor. China's influence in the area was to be increased through the BRI's infrastructure development, which included building out road and rail networks.
Security Cooperation: China engaged in security cooperation with Central Asian states, particularly on issues related to counterterrorism and stability. This cooperation was seen as mutually beneficial.
Iran:
Cultural and Religious Ties: Iran has religious and cultural relations with several Central Asian nations, especially those where the Muslim population is sizable. These connections aided in fostering political and economic cooperation.
Energy Trade: Iran aimed to increase imports of natural gas and other energy-related goods with Central Asian nations. This commerce offered Iran and Central Asia a financial boost.
Geopolitical Influence: Iran's larger regional and global agenda included efforts to influence the area. This influence was frequently used to challenge the idea that other nations, especially the US, were inherently superior.
Economic Interests
There were also commercial conflicts and economic rivalry, particularly with regard to market and export route access. In 1992, competition for development projects and international investment was another source of economic strain in Central Asia.
Access to Markets:
Market Diversification: Central Asian countries sought to diversify their markets to reduce dependency on a single trading partner, such as Russia. They aimed to explore new trading opportunities with countries beyond the former Soviet bloc.
Trade Agreements: Central Asian states negotiated trade agreements and partnerships with a variety of countries. These agreements aimed to facilitate the export of the region's energy resources, minerals, and other products.
Export Routes:
Pipeline Diplomacy: The competition for pipeline routes was intense. Central Asian countries, Russia, the United States, and China vied for influence over pipeline infrastructure. The choices regarding the direction of pipelines would significantly impact the region's energy exports.
Transit Countries: The role of transit countries, through which pipelines passed, became a point of contention. These countries sought transit fees and influenced the direction of pipeline routes. This added complexity to the negotiations and agreements surrounding export routes.
Foreign Investment:
Competition for Investment: Central Asian states actively competed for foreign investment, particularly in their energy sectors. Attracting foreign companies and investment was seen as a means to develop the region's vast natural resources.
Investment Incentives: Central Asian countries offered various incentives to attract foreign investment, including tax breaks, regulatory reforms, and guarantees of stability. These incentives were used to entice foreign energy companies to explore and exploit the region's resources.
Development Projects:
Infrastructure Development: Infrastructure projects were crucial for the transportation of goods and resources. Central Asian countries sought foreign investment and international development projects to build and upgrade roads, railways, and ports.
Hydropower Projects: The construction of hydropower dams and facilities was a source of competition. Upstream countries like Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan sought investment and support for these projects to harness their energy potential.
Economic Zones: Some Central Asian states established special economic zones to attract foreign investors. These zones often provided incentives such as tax exemptions and streamlined administrative procedures.
In 1992, there was a wide range of political philosophies and methods of government in Central Asia, from emerging democracies to authoritarianism and strongman control. Tensions occasionally resulted from these disparities in governing paradigms, particularly when political ideologies collided as in the cases of civil wars, ethnic conflicts, and the repression of religion. Security considerations, international variables, and historical legacies all had an additional impact on the political dynamics of the area.
Kazakhstan:
Authoritarianism to Pragmatism: Kazakhstan, under President Nursultan Nazarbayev, pursued a pragmatic approach to governance. While it had authoritarian elements, it also adopted policies that encouraged economic liberalization and market reforms. These political shifts aimed at balancing stability with economic development.
Multi-Ethnic State: Kazakhstan's governance model had to navigate the complexities of a multi-ethnic state, with Kazakhs as the titular ethnic group and significant Russian and other minority populations. Tensions occasionally arose regarding language policies and the balance of power.
Uzbekistan:
Strongman Rule: Uzbekistan was characterized by strongman rule under President Islam Karimov. The government maintained tight control over political opposition, dissent, and religious expression. This approach was intended to maintain stability in the country.
Religious Suppression: The government's stance on religion was particularly notable. Uzbekistan aggressively suppressed religious movements it deemed extremist, leading to concerns about human rights and religious freedom.
Kyrgyzstan:
Emerging Democracy: In contrast to some of its neighbors, Kyrgyzstan has endeavored to shift towards a more democratic system of government. It aimed to advance political pluralism, civil society, and free media while holding competitive elections.
Ethnic Politics: Kyrgyzstan had its share of political tensions, including ethnic clashes. The Kyrgyz and Uzbek communities sometimes clashed over political representation and resource allocation, particularly in the southern regions.
Tajikistan:
Civil War and Instability: Following the start of a civil war in 1992, Tajikistan experienced severe political instability. The conflict, which matched Islamist opposition organizations against secular government troops, complicated the political climate of the nation.
Ethnic and Political Division: The Tajik majority in the government and the ethnic Uzbeks and other minority groups supporting the opposition gave the civil war ethnic and political aspects. These schisms remained after the battle.
Turkmenistan:
Authoritarian Rule: Turkmenistan was under the rule of President Saparmurat Niyazov, who established a cult of personality and maintained a highly authoritarian regime. Political dissent and opposition were not tolerated.
Cult of Personality: Niyazov's cult of personality and eccentric policies, such as renaming months and days of the week after himself, contributed to the country's isolation and unique political landscape.
Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict
The First Nagorno-Karabakh War was an ethnic and territorial conflict between the Republic of Azerbaijan, supported by Turkey, and the majority ethnic Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh, backed by Armenia, that lasted from February 1988 to May 1994 in the enclave of Nagorno-Karabakh in southwest Azerbaijan. As the conflict dragged on, Azerbaijan's attempt to quell the separatist movement in Nagorno-Karabakh led to a lengthy and undeclared mountain combat between the two former Soviet republics, Armenia and Azerbaijan, high in the Karabakh mountains.
The referendum, boycotted by Nagorno-Karabakh's Azerbaijani population, saw 99.89% vote in favor of independence with 82.2% turnout after the enclave's parliament voted in favor of joining Armenia. The call for unity with Armenia started out relatively peacefully in 1988. However, as the Soviet Union broke up, the demand for unity grew more violent, leading to ethnic cleansing. Examples of this violence include the pogroms in Sumgait (1988) and Baku (1990) against Armenians, the Gugark pogrom (1988), and the Khojaly Massacre (1992) against Azerbaijanis.
Shortly after the Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast (NKAO) in Azerbaijan's parliament decided on February 20, 1988, to unify the province with Armenia, interethnic confrontations between the two occurred. The conclusion of a territorial dispute was the proclamation of separation from Azerbaijan. The Armenian majority decided to vote to separate from Azerbaijan and establish the unrecognized Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh at the same time that Azerbaijan announced its independence from the Soviet Union and abolished the powers held by the enclave's administration.
In early 1992, a full-scale assault broke out. The Republic of Turkey helped blockade commerce, including humanitarian supplies, to Armenia and deployed mercenaries to fight for Azerbaijan. The Conference for Security and Co-operation in Europe (CSCE), among other organizations, tried international mediation to reach a settlement that would have been acceptable to both parties, but they were unsuccessful. Early in 1993, seven areas outside the enclave with a majority of Azerbaijanis were taken by Armenian forces, raising concerns about other nations getting involved in the area. By the time the conflict ended in 1994, the Armenians had taken complete control of the enclave and the neighboring Azerbaijani areas, including the mountain pass known as the Lachin Corridor, which connects Nagorno-Karabakh to the Armenian mainland. In May 1994, a ceasefire mediated by Russia was agreed upon.
The conflict resulted in the expulsion of over 724,000 Azerbaijanis from Armenia, Nagorno-Karabakh, and the adjacent areas, and the displacement of 300,000–500,000 Armenians who were residing in Azerbaijan or Armenian border areas. The OSCE Minsk Group conducted frequent peace discussions between Armenia and Azerbaijan after the conflict, although they were unsuccessful in producing a peace deal over a long period of time. As a result, the Republic of Artsakh continued to be de facto sovereign but not recognized internationally, leaving the Nagorno-Karabakh region in a condition of legal limbo. Tensions remained high, with sporadic armed confrontations. Up to the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War in 2020, 9% of Azerbaijan's territory was under Armenian occupation.
Last updated
